The Policy Of Accompany With Maternity Leave Clearly Shows That The System Can Not Be A Mere Scrap Of Paper.

With the introduction of the new family planning ordinance in Guangdong, at least 29 provinces across the country have explicitly defined the time limit for accompanying production in the new local family planning ordinance.

In order to prevent this kind of general public demand from becoming a good welfare "painting cake", we should also establish a policy environment for both work and family through certain institutional norms, and guide employers and individuals to implement paternity leave.

That is to say, if the paternity leave is to be landed, the government also needs to release some "dividends", such as tax preferences and appropriate subsidies, to make up for the shortfall in the efficiency of the employer due to the employee's vacations, so as to ensure that the workers will not be affected by the vacation.

Treatment.

In addition, it is necessary to confirm paternity leave in legislative form based on scientific research and pform local policies into national laws.

In this way, we can avoid the injustice brought about by local differences, and also take the "one small step" of maternity leave benefits to promote "a big step" in our social civilization.

Among them, the shortest paternity leave is 7 days, the longest is 1 months.

Whether the male workers can enjoy this "welfare"? Reporter survey found that most people can enjoy full paternity leave, but some of them have been "shrunk" in their paternity leave, and some even face embarrassment.

That is, when a woman is in childbirth, her husband enjoys the right to care and take care of his wife for a certain period of time.

After the opening of the comprehensive two child policy, the provinces have adjusted the number of days of marriage and maternity leave, and at the same time have explicitly defined the time limit for male accompany production, which fully embodies the humanistic care of the policy and is also an institutional compensation for national welfare.

From the perspective of eugenics, it is obvious that the benefits of male accompany with maternity leave are obvious.

But good.

There may not be good implementation.

According to the report, there are three types of paternity leave in specific implementation: explicitly stipulating paternity leave as "attendance"; no system provision, but can be asked off; if "work too busy and not enough manpower", it can also be called back to work overtime.

But no matter what type, there is one thing in common: the execution of accompany production depends entirely on the will of the employer.

As far as individuals and families are concerned, in the environment where paid leave is not yet fully implemented, the woman will have to take a few months' maternity leave. If the man has another week's rest, he will have a week, a month and a month's paternity leave, and the income will definitely shrink.

Therefore, it is also a difficult choice for male workers to rest and continue to accompany maternity leave.

Just as the media survey, many workers reflected that they had paid off maternity leave and lost a lot of income.

We must say that how to calculate the wages and benefits during the holidays is also an obstacle.